Comic 25 - TIM 017

27th Dec 2010, 4:06 AM in experiMental Record One
<<First Latest>>
Average Rating: 5 (4 votes)

Author Notes:

-3- 27th Dec 2010, 4:06 AM edit delete
-3- 27th Dec 2010, 4:10 AM edit delete
We has a new Vote Incentive for the last week of the year - a sneak peek ahead at what's to come in the opening weeks of 2011! How could you stand NOT to look?!?


Jrade 27th Dec 2010, 4:08 AM edit delete

That's my guess, at least. If it comes true, I take full credit for the idea, and demand royalties.
-3- 27th Dec 2010, 4:12 AM edit delete
All the clues needed to determine who our guest star is are presented in this strip.
Beyond that, i say nothing. 27th Dec 2010, 4:35 AM edit delete
Sherlock Holmes!
MadTarnsman 27th Dec 2010, 4:58 AM edit delete
Well, just a knee jerk guess would say Timothy Leary is coming for a visit!!
-3- 27th Dec 2010, 5:50 AM edit delete
Y'know - after wednesday's strip i think i'm going to have to ask y'all what clues pointed you to those answers.
me 27th Dec 2010, 8:55 AM edit delete
That could ether be Ruphus T Firefly or Capt Spalding. I'm not sure which they look an awful lot alike
-3- 27th Dec 2010, 9:28 AM edit delete
Ah - NOW we're ballparking!
moizmad 27th Dec 2010, 1:34 PM edit delete
My guess is the fellow in the bright nightgown.
moizmad 27th Dec 2010, 1:39 PM edit delete
Just came back from the future, and the future!
NarcoticVenus 27th Dec 2010, 2:38 PM edit delete
Excess chocolate sounds surely fine to me.
-3- 27th Dec 2010, 3:04 PM edit delete
Chocoholism is a fine thing, really. (Current nibble - a few squares from a Cadbury Dairy Milk bar) 31st Dec 2010, 4:14 AM edit delete
Here are my reasons for thinking he might be Sherlock Holmes: Panel 2 silhouette wasn't clearly a hairdo to me, I thought it might be Sherlock's famous hat, although it looks more like a witch hat to me. His condescending tone seemed to resonate with that haughty Holmes intellect, and his deduction of chocolate and ass-sitting seemed elementary, my dear -3-!
-3- 31st Dec 2010, 1:33 PM edit delete
I suspected the analytical reasoning in panel 4 might have played a fair part. But since i knew what the silhouette was, i didn't contemplate that possibility at all.